Print

Study Guide: Letting God into Your Box

Sunday December 21, 2003 | Greg Boyd

Focus Scripture:


Brief Summary:

This week Greg again focused our attention on the story of the Magi from the east (Mt 2:1-11). God was willing to “get in the box” with these astrologers, to “speak their language” as it were, even though it required that God suspend his ethical opinions about their way of life. God's love for astrologers was greater than his hatred for astrology.


Extended Summary:

This week Greg again focused our attention on the Magi from the east (Mt 2:1-11). Once again, he brought out the rather stark “messy” aspects of the story. It doesn’t fit our “religious” expectations. While God clearly hates all forms of divination – astrology, psychics, etc. – he was willing not only to call astrologers from Persia to visit Christ, but to also use astrology as a means of doing this! Why? Because, as Greg said, his love for astrologers was greater than his hatred for astrology. He was willing to “get in the box” with these astrologers, to “speak their language” as it were, even though it required that God suspend his ethical opinions about astrology to do this!

This is what God does with all of us. He gets in our box. He comes down to our level. But it costs God something to do it. In fact, it costs God everything! This is what Calvary is all about. As much as the all holy God hates sin, he bears it for our sake, for his love for us sinners is greater than his hatred for our sin.

From this Greg brought out three points. First, we need to let God “in our box.” Whatever we are going through, however messy our lives may be, we can trust that God isn’t “too holy” to be willing to get involved. Greg even encouraged us to let God into messes we don’t yet want to be free of – that is, sin we don’t yet want to get rid of. For in letting the love of God into our life, we give God a chance to begin to change our wants and desires.

Second, Greg said that as soon as a person lets Christ “into their box”, they have an “impulse” to worship. When we experience God ascribing unsurpassable worth to us, despite our failings, we want to ascribe unsurpassable worth back to God. This is what worship is. What we have to offer in worship isn’t important, but the heart we have in offering it is. God accepted the gifts of the Magi as an act of worship, even though these gifts were purchased by occult money. While God doesn’t condone the way these astrologers earned their money, he honored the heart behind their offering and, by his grace, accepted it as worship. So it is with everything we sacrifice in ascribing worth to God. Our past, our time, our talent, our money… it all becomes “holy” when offered to God with a heart of praise. Greg contrasted God’s stance toward the Magi with many pastors stance last year toward the man who tithed from his lottery winnings to illustrate the point he was making.

Finally, Greg said that a person who has let Christ “into their box” has a Spirit-inspired calling to do the same to others. As Christ has loved us, we are to love others. Just as God suspended his own ethical opinions about astrology to “get in the box” with the astrologers, so we are to suspend our ethical judgments to “get in the box” with others. We are called to love without judgment. Greg used the illustration of the two prostitutes (Jane and Jenny) with the doctor (John Hughes) to illustrate this point.


Reflection Questions:

  1. Do you find Greg’s claim that God is willing to suspend his ethical judgments to “get in the box” with astrologers – and with us – surprising? Can you think of other times in the Bible where God has let go of his ideals to accommodate himself to fallen human reality?
  2. Discuss God’s willingness to accept the gifts of the Magi, purchased with occult money. Greg applied this to the man winning the lottery. Would you agree with the pastors who argued that a church shouldn’t accept offerings from lottery money because, in their view, the lottery is evil? Or would you agree with Greg that the heart of the person making the offering is more important than how the offering was acquired?
  3. What are the implications of Greg’s point that God accepts as genuine worship to gifts of the Magi, even though God disagreed with their profession and with how they got the money for their gifts? Does God accept as genuine worship the offerings of all people, however mixed up their theology and however sinful their life, if their heart is hungry for God?
  4. If you were in Dr. Hughes’s shoes and a prostitute came to you wanting help preventing STD’s and getting help once she got them, what would you do? Are there other examples you can think of where a Christian should put aside their own convictions about matters to “get in the box” with people? Are there circumstances in which they shouldn’t set aside their convictions to “get in the box” with people?

Print