about-bg about-bg

Watch/Listen

Risky Marriage

• Greg Boyd

In this third message of our Worth the Risk series, Greg talks about marriage relationships and explores the meaning of Ephesians 5:22, which says that wives must submit to their husbands.

Show Extended Summary Hide Extended Summary

This week’s sermon started with a skit, of a young unmarried woman weighing the pros and cons of submitting to her husband, as prescribed in Ephesians 5:22.

First, Greg affirmed that it is perfectly okay not to ever get married. There seems to be a belief among some people that getting married is what “normal” people do. This is not the case, and in fact both Jesus and Paul affirm staying single as an advantageous way to serve the kingdom.

For those who are married, though, today’s sermon is about Ephesians 5 and what that means for modern marriages.

In Genesis 2 when God created woman, she was made to be a “suitable helper” for Adam. This had a connotation of being a complementary equal. The two in a very real sense were made into one flesh– this includes not just intercourse but also commitment to live together as one. The phrase Suitable Partner also has a connotation that they were brought together for a task. Eve was not an assistant, but a co-equal partner. The task they came together for was to be fruitful and multiply, and carry out God’s loving care over the earth and animals. It truly is a partnership with a purpose.

In Matthew 6, Jesus tells us to “seek first the kingdom of God.” This means not in just certain circumstances, but rather in all things at all times with all people we should have our minds set on the kingdom. Whether you are married or not, if you are a follower of Jesus, you are here on assignment — to be ambassadors of the kingdom of God and represent Christ to the world. This applies to everything, and therefore it also applies to marriage.

Many people do not have this mission on their minds when they get married. This is normal, but we need to start retrofitting the kingdom into our marriages. We need to start asking how can I help my partner be the best kingdom person he/she can be? Recognizing that the kingdom is our most important purpose in being married is one of the best things we can do for our marriages. The kingdom is the strongest glue there is! It puts everything else in perspective.

The traditional view is that the man should control the finances of the family. (Greg & Shelley’s marriage is a great example of why this traditional view is not always right!) There is no “one size fits all” formula for how to divide up marriage responsibilities.

Two questions remain — what to make of the biblical teaching that the man is the head of the wife, and whether or not this is a timeless teaching.

First, it is important to explore the context of this passage. The context in this case starts earlier in Ephesians 5 where Paul teaches us that to be imitators of God is to “live in love as Christ loved us and gave his life for us.” He then explores what this looks model like in different areas of life. When he gets to marriage, it is consistent in that we should submit to (sacrifice, come under) one another in reverence to Christ.

This was a radical view at the time it was written. When Paul wrote these words, women were essentially the property of their husbands. So telling husbands to love their wives as Christ loved the church (i.e., give himself up for her) was a radical idea!

During the fall, the curse which came upon humanity and the earth was that wives would “desire” (the meaning of which is actually to manipulate or try to control or connive against) their husbands, and the husband will rule over (the meaning of this word was to tyrannize, conquer or dominate) over her. In this curse, the beautiful plan that God had for two to become one flesh and work together to bring about the kingdom has turned into a power struggle. So in prescribing for us to live in love as Christ did and sacrifice for one another, Paul is showing that faith in Christ reverses this curse and reclaims marriage as God designed it to be.

The distinctive thing is not wives submitting to their husbands, since they were already doing that. The important thing is the reason why — it is now out of love instead of fear. And it is especially distinctive that the husband is responsible to initiate this submission — he has all the power, so he must lay it down for his wife, just as Christ emptied himself and sacrificed himself for us. And in response, wives submit to him in love. So now instead of a power struggle pushing each other down, it’s a beautiful dance, each lifting the other up.

As for whether this teaching of the husband being the head is timeless, there are two schools of thought. Egalitarians believe that husbands were the head of the family in the first century, but they would say this does not always hold true now. The other view is called Complimentarian, they believe that the teaching IS timeless. But BOTH views are fine when you are defining marriage like Paul does, as mutual submission. The only difference is who initiates the submission. But it does not change the dynamic.

Hide Extended Summary

Topics: Controversial Issues, Kingdom of God, Marriage, Power

Sermon Series: Worth the Risk


Downloads & Resources

Audio File
Video File
Study guide (opens new window)
Slides

Subscribe to Podcast Buy Media

5 thoughts on “Risky Marriage

    Mickey Rooney says: Monday September 26, 2016 at 5:35 pm

    A balanced view of marriage. But that’s what my wife told me to write.

    Reply
    Donald McKay says: Sunday October 16, 2016 at 12:19 pm

    It seems to us that the Egalitarian perspective is more than that, it’s more neo-feminist than is admitted. It’s why 1 Cor 11:3 is not let in on the discussion. Is not headship in the family in direct correlation to that in the Godhead? It seems that this is unwittingly aimed, but is a subtle attack on the reality that “authority always flows down, never up or sideways.” Authority must always be loving or it’s authority abused. The egalitarians we’ve asked about this don’t deal well with the authority issue. Their implication is that God the Father sent His Son to die for us, but it could equally have happened that the Son sent the Father to die for us; they’re equals so it could have gone either way, like a cosmic coin-toss. Did Jesus ever say, “I sometimes / usually do the will of My father?” No. God the Father gave his Son “all authority” because of His faithfulness in obeying Him, yes? God the Father and God the Son are equally God, but each embrace (not “accept”) their roles in the hierarchy of the Godhead – which certainly exists and is demonstrated repeatedly all through Scripture. Complementarianism seems to be, not the culture, but the reality until Jesus returns and makes all things new. But thank you, Greg, for a great teaching on marriage, relationships, and ministry! We’re so encouraged by your marriage experiences, and seeing ourselves also more as a “dynamic duo”! May many more hear, understand, seek the Holy Spirit’s guidance, and do!

    Reply
    Peter says: Friday October 21, 2016 at 3:23 am

    Donald – I agree with where you are going with your comments and you may be interested in reading this study that perhaps puts ‘more meat on the bones’ when it comes to authority and obedience:-

    http://www.newcreationlibrary.net/books/pdf/095_LFS05.pdf

    Reply
    Donald McKay says: Sunday October 23, 2016 at 11:19 am

    Good stuff, Peter! Meat. Thanks! Methinks that love and hatred are not opposites as some teach. I think of competition as being the term. Love kneels down, reaches out, and lifts the others up. Competition puffs up its chest, reaches out, and lifts itself while suppressing / besting the others, which it sees as an opponents / adversaries. Isaiah 14 seems to demonstrate this. Hatred seems more at home with ignoring and bitterly backbiting others. But I’m still chewing on this idea.

    Reply
    Peter says: Wednesday October 26, 2016 at 7:29 am

    Donald – These items may assist you in your contemplation of love and hate. Firstly, 1 Jn 3:11-15,

    “For this is the message you heard from the beginning: We should love one another. Do not be like Cain, who belonged to the evil one and murdered his brother. And why did he murder him? Because his own actions were evil and his brother’s were righteous. Do not be surprised, my brothers and sisters, if the world hates you. We know that we have passed from death to life, because we love each other. Anyone who does not love remains in death. Anyone who hates a brother or sister is a murderer, and you know that no murderer has eternal life residing in him.”

    Secondly, an audio study looking at the lives of Cain and Abel highlights the aspects of love and hate mentioned above, and may help your understanding of these important terms,

    http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=31813237599

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*

 

testimonial-icon

"It's been so supportive to have a journey group leader since 7th grade that I have made a lasting relationship with for 6 years. She has helped me grow in my faith and has been there to check in!"

– Laura, high school student